In this article we will show why the missing link is completely erroneous concept of evolution
First, the main reason for this fallacy stems from a misunderstanding of the process of evolution itself. A lot of people think of evolution as a long series of increases in the complexity gradually or that a vertical scale to be bacteria and worms exist bottom, topped by animals and human sits on top. In fact, evolution is not a chain or ladder to look for the lost rings in the middle. For example, a man is not descended from chimpanzees so it does not have missing links between us. We share a joint with him only advances.
Evolution is a dense tree branches and tangled branches does not have a top or bottom and there is no more sophisticated than the other object. Evolution is only the growth of these branches and an increase in the ramifications ..
Second: the perception that paleontologists who can find the fossil to be the object (direct predecessor) to another object is something that is very unlikely. Imagine that you are going in a big historic cemetery, what is the probability that stumble the grave of a person who is the direct predecessor ???? Not to mention that is a rare process and have special conditions such as location and manner of death of the object, which makes finding the fossils very difficult. For this reason, we find researchers are finding mostly on fossils of transitional objects are close or not the direct ancestors and already there are dozens of transitional fossils have been found.
Third: moderation objects shaped not be predicted mostly by person. Because the organs in the body do not change at the same time and at the same speed. For example, man began walking upright on his feet before he grows the size of his brain. So the expectation of finding a fossil average human being has the size and can walk to the mid-range on his feet is a sinner.
But one might ask: What about the gaps in the fossil record? For example, there are some of the layers that contain a certain type of objects followed by a layer above where those objects disappear to show another type different about him.
Here comes the principle (balance) (punctuated equilibrium) It occurs when separated a small group of objects for the largest group and move to another place and isolated and with the passage of time increases the genetic differences between the two groups two categories different geographically. So you do not expect to find discrete and advanced group in the same geographical location or in the top layers of them because they simply moved to another place. Bullet balance installed in the corals which is not the general rule in evolution
First, the main reason for this fallacy stems from a misunderstanding of the process of evolution itself. A lot of people think of evolution as a long series of increases in the complexity gradually or that a vertical scale to be bacteria and worms exist bottom, topped by animals and human sits on top. In fact, evolution is not a chain or ladder to look for the lost rings in the middle. For example, a man is not descended from chimpanzees so it does not have missing links between us. We share a joint with him only advances.
Evolution is a dense tree branches and tangled branches does not have a top or bottom and there is no more sophisticated than the other object. Evolution is only the growth of these branches and an increase in the ramifications ..
Second: the perception that paleontologists who can find the fossil to be the object (direct predecessor) to another object is something that is very unlikely. Imagine that you are going in a big historic cemetery, what is the probability that stumble the grave of a person who is the direct predecessor ???? Not to mention that is a rare process and have special conditions such as location and manner of death of the object, which makes finding the fossils very difficult. For this reason, we find researchers are finding mostly on fossils of transitional objects are close or not the direct ancestors and already there are dozens of transitional fossils have been found.
Third: moderation objects shaped not be predicted mostly by person. Because the organs in the body do not change at the same time and at the same speed. For example, man began walking upright on his feet before he grows the size of his brain. So the expectation of finding a fossil average human being has the size and can walk to the mid-range on his feet is a sinner.
But one might ask: What about the gaps in the fossil record? For example, there are some of the layers that contain a certain type of objects followed by a layer above where those objects disappear to show another type different about him.
Here comes the principle (balance) (punctuated equilibrium) It occurs when separated a small group of objects for the largest group and move to another place and isolated and with the passage of time increases the genetic differences between the two groups two categories different geographically. So you do not expect to find discrete and advanced group in the same geographical location or in the top layers of them because they simply moved to another place. Bullet balance installed in the corals which is not the general rule in evolution
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق